gre作文教程

gre作文教程内容摘要：

contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence SCORE 0  Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal 9 2． 4 ETS Argument 评分标准 GRE Scoring Guide: Analyze an Argument Each Analyze an Argument essay will be scored on a 6point holistic scale according to the criteria below. Although the GRE Writing Assessment contains two discrete essaywriting tasks, a single bined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone. The score reported will represent the average of the scores for the two essays. SCORE 6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, wellarticulated critique of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully. A typical paper in this category  clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully  develops ideas cogently, anizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions  effectively supports the main points of the critique  demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety  demonstrates facility with the conventions (., grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors SCORE 5 A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, welldeveloped critique of the argument and conveys meaning clearly. A typical paper in this category  clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a generally perceptive way  develops ideas clearly, anizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions  sensibly supports the main points of the critique  demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety  demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors SCORE 4 A 4 paper presents a petent critique of the argument and conveys meaning adequately. A typical paper in this category 10  identifies and analyzes important features of the argument  develops and anizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions  supports the main points of the critique  demonstrates sufficient control of language to express ideas with reasonable clarity  generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors SCORE 3 A 3 paper demonstrates some petence in its critique of the argument and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed. A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:  does not identify or analyze most of the important features of the argument, although some analysis of the argument is present  mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly  is limited in the logical development and anization of ideas  offers support of little relevance and value for points of the critique  lacks clarity in expressing ideas  contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning SCORE 2 A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:  does not present a critique based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer39。 s own views on the subject  does not develop ideas, or is disanized and illogical  provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support  has serious problems in the use of language and in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning  contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning SCORE 1 A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in both analysis AND writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits more than one of the following characteristics:  provides little or no evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the argument  provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an anized response  has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning  contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence SCORE 0 11  Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal. 第三章 入门如何准备 满分校园 () gre 备考笔考班论坛里面，问的最多的问题，就是：“我是新手，不知道从哪里下手。 往往一句都写不出来。 看到版主们写的这么好的文章，自己不知道如何开始。 看到一篇论题，写什么。 如何写。 心理一点条理都没有。 ” 这个，是猴哥这本书的写作重点。 对于大部分中国考生来说，英语的写作，实在是太少了。 我们也只在中考、高考、四级、六级、研究生等国内考试前，突击背过几篇范文，写过 少数的几篇文章。 看看版主们的文章。 （附在本章最后），你就会发现，也有些的好的人。 他们为什么写的那么好呢。 他们经常写，写的多了，自然就有感觉了。 猴哥满分校园作文版版主 scortio，已经坚持每日一篇作文 40 多天，她的作文，被很多 g 友误认为是 ETS 的范文。 实际上，她的文章，大部分都可以达到 5 分的标准，很多，甚 至是 6 分的标准。 本书有大量的版主和 G 友的精彩作文。 从上面的论述，我们可以得出一个结论： 多练是写好 GRE 作文的一个重要途径。 但是，这如前面所说，很多 G 友也想多练，但是，不知道如何开始。 猴哥作文备考 11 步。 仔细阅读本书的第一章，对 GRE 作文有一个整体了解。 知道要写什么。 仔细阅读本书的第二章的第一节，知道 ETS 对 GRE 作文的评分标准，和猴哥对三个写作重点的分析。 仔细研读本书“猴哥阅读式作文备考法”，体会这一种入门方法，仔细看猴哥使用这个方法的两个例子。 这个，是 入门的关键。 先读 ETS 的 6 分范文，然后就知道如何写了。 但是，读，就一定要读投，要对自己写作能力有大的提高。 如何读，请看相关章节。 在掌握了“猴哥阅读式作文备考法”之后，使用本书提供的 72 篇 ETS 公布的范文，对其中的 46 分的 36 篇，用阅读式方法，进行复习。 这个过程， 46 分的不用全练，可以先练 12 篇。 这些文章，也是最值得背诵的。 本熟这些文章，你基本上就可以写出 4 分的作文了。 同时，可以看看少量的 31 分作文，看看为什么分数低，自己如何避免。 仔细阅读本书“集体写作法”一章。 体会本方法的精髓。 然 后，参加到“集体写作法”的大本营中来。 你先开始可能写不出来，每天写一篇也不现实。 但是，每天对于满分校园的主题，写一篇提纲，还是可以的。 写提纲，是写作文的开始。 仔细阅读本书“互相修改法”一章。 体会本方法的精髓。 然后，参加到“互相修改法”大本营中来。 修改别人的文章，你是从改卷者的角度阅读，你就会不由自主的变得苛刻起来。 你也会发现别人的很多问题，而这些问题，如果出在自己身上，往往不容易发现，所谓“旁观者清，当局者迷”。 而你的作品，也会被很多人修改。 同时，继续使用“猴哥阅读式作文备考法”，对“集 中写作法”中，本日写的比较好的文章，进行阅读。 总结出的“句型收获”的句子（参见本书“经典句型收集”一章），放到满分校园“经典句型收集”论坛。 和大家共享。 在练习了一段时间后，再回过头来，使用“猴。